• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
Democrats Abroad UK

Democrats Abroad UK

Representing US citizens throughout England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland

  • Voting From Abroad
  • Who We Are
    • Caucuses and Committees
      • Black Caucus
      • Film Committee and Film Nights
      • Get Out The Vote
      • LGBTQ+ Caucus
      • Policy Network and Resolutions Committee
      • DAUK Political Book Club
      • Progressive Democrats Caucus
      • Tax Committee
      • Women’s Caucus
      • Young Democrats
    • Chapters and Regions
      • Cambridge Chapter
      • Oxford Chapter
      • Scotland Chapter
      • Bath, Bristol & The Cotswolds
      • West Midlands
    • Elected Officials
    • Contact Us
  • Get Involved
  • Our Events ↗
  • Visit DA Global ↗
  • Donate ↗
  • Show Search
Hide Search
Home/Committees/Film Committee & Film Nights/Inequality for All Briefing Notes

Inequality for All Briefing Notes

Briefing Notes No 35


June 20, 2014

Inequality for All (2013)

After-screening panel discussion and Q and A with Professor Peter Kingstone, Co-Director of the International Development Institute at Kings College, University of London

Focussing on the last forty years, Robert Reich charts the scale and trajectory of economic inequality in the USA and assesses its impact on economic growth and American democracy.

He demonstrates how the economic position of the “middle class” has declined:  not only relatively compared to the wealthy, but also absolutely in terms of disposable income and earning power.

He stresses how this matters for economic growth and the viability of the “American Dream”. Reich argues that, in a consumer economy like the USA, the engine of economic growth is the consumer demand of the middle class.

Union membership was a key means of protecting and enhancing the earning power of the middle class, but has significantly declined (from 35% in the 50s to 11.3% today). The growth of two income households mitigated the decline in individual (traditionally male) earning power, but in recent years households have dramatically increased their reliance on debt to maintain their standards of living. In 1969, the ratio of debt to household income was 1:1; by 2008, it had risen to 12:1.

Wealth and income inequality

  • The top 1% holds 35%+ of the nation’s wealth; the bottom 50% controls 2.5%.
  • The richest 400 Americans have more wealth than the bottom 150 million Americans.
  • In 1970 the top 1% took home 9% of national income; today, they take home 23%.
  • In 1970 the ratio of CEO earnings to their average employee was 50:1; by the 2000s, it was 350:1.

Are these claims overstated?  This Film Night should encourage us all  to take these issues seriously, investigate the situation for voters overseas and in our home states, and decide for ourselves.

Earning power

  • 1978: ‘typical male worker’ earned $48,302; 2010, earned 33,751.
  • 1970s:  $35,143 median disposable income; housing cost 15,579; healthcare, 1,686; college, 903.
  • 2010:   $26,578 median disposable income; housing cost 21,684; healthcare, 7,082; childcare, 3,005; college, 1,833.

Reich comments: “Government sets the rules by which the market functions. All of  these rules are necessary to construct a free market. The real question is whom do these rules benefit and whom do they hurt?”

Some Talking Points: 

  • Rising inequality: Picketty’s work is causing a storm with critics arguing (as they have done for years) that it is not happening. What data do people use to make their cases?  What do you consider valid and reliable data?
  •  If it is happening, why? The film identifies both political and economic causes. What are the main economic explanations? What are the political explanations? Can we counter this politically, or is it just ‘globalisation’?  Is the USA different, or is inequality rising everywhere?
  • President Obama has called for a focus on policies to address inequality. What more could or should the Obama and Clinton administrations have done to raise awareness and address this issue?
  • What are the key policies that you think Democrats can or should be focussing on at national and state levels to address deepening inequality?  How should “inequality” be addressed in the mid-terms?
Pages: Page 1 Page 2

Written by:
elaine
Published on:
September 12, 2020

Categories: Film Committee & Film Nights, Past DAUK Film NightsTags: economic inequality

Explore more

Donate to Democrats Abroad

Footer

Join Democrats Abroad | Press Enquiries | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2023 Democrats Abroad UK

We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
Cookie settingsRead MoreACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT