• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
Democrats Abroad UK

Democrats Abroad UK

Representing US citizens throughout England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland

  • Voting From Abroad
  • Who We Are
    • Caucuses and Committees
      • Black Caucus
      • Film Committee and Film Nights
      • Get Out The Vote & Voter Registration Committee
      • LGBTQ+ Caucus
      • Policy Network and Resolutions Committee
      • Political Book Club
      • Tax Committee
      • Women’s Caucus
      • Young Democrats
    • Chapters and Regions
      • Cambridge Chapter
      • Oxford Chapter
      • Scotland Chapter
      • Bath, Bristol & The Cotswolds
    • Elected Officials
  • Our Events
  • Get Involved
  • Contact Us
  • Visit DA Global ↗
  • Show Search
Hide Search
Home/Committees/Film Committee & Film Nights/CitizenFour Briefing Notes

CitizenFour Briefing Notes

Briefing Notes No 40
CitizenFour by Laura Poitras
November 20, 2015

After-screening panel discussion and Q and A Ewen MacAskill and Robert Carolina with Stephanie Stewart – moderator.  

About the film

It is almost two and a half years since the events documented in this film took place.

What did  Edward Snowden disclose?

Snowden  downloaded and gave journalists documents (estimates range from 50,000 – 1.7 million) about NSA surveillance programs operated by the USA and its key allies. 

In the USA, most attention has focussed on the NSA   massive, bulk collection and storage of the meta-data of phone and internet-based communications and activities of US (and foreign) citizens via various programs.

But also included were accounts of US surveillance and spying on foreign governments, including allies, hacking of Chinese computers, a Presidential directive for cyberwar against specifically named countries, and details of surveillance used for drone strikes in Pakistan. 

How did he disclose it? 

Snowden gave copies of these documents to journalists at The Guardian and Washington Post and the filmmaker – whom he said he trusted to make “responsible” disclosures (e.g. selected and redacted) and to keep the documents secure,  arguing that he was not engaged in “data dumping” and that no names of NSA operatives were revealed.  Some call this a “distinction without a difference,”   Both the US Guardian and The Washington Post give  the US government advance warning and prior sight of their articles. 

The New York Times (via The Guardian) also has the files.  Snowden  also provided specific reports to others, eg South China Morning Post. 

Questions remain about who has had access to these documents, their security, and the effectiveness of redaction. 

Who has access to intelligence and state secrets?

Both the Manning and Snowden cases raise questions about the accessibility of USA classified material.

Following 9/11 there was an emphasis on the need to share intelligence within the intelligence community.  There has also been a very significant growth in the use of private contractors, such as Booz Allen—Snowden’s employer..

The growth of technical capabilities for the collection, storage and analysis of massive amounts of data enables mass surveillance and also facilitates the downloading and wide distribution of vast amounts of data easily and quickly —  not only within,  but also outside prescribed networks.

Who should be the arbiter of what remains a government  “secret” ?

Snowden says he accepts the necessity for secrets and surveillance, and described his motivation as the promotion of public debate to generate more transparency and accountability.

 In the US this framework  is centered on the executive branch, with legislative oversight via intelligence committees, judicial  oversight (limited via the “state secrets privilege”) and,  for specific types of surveillance, the FISA Court. . A 1998 law provides a process and some protection for intelligence community whistle-blowers. However Snowden and others argue that the exercise of oversight has been insufficient, ineffective and  inappropriate .

The “free press” – the Fourth Estate – has always played a vital role of exposure and disclosure with the protection of  the First Amendment. New platforms for publishing and dissemination of materials disrupt the conventions of this model.

What are the rights and responsibilities of private organizations vis a vis  democratically elected  governments? Are we comfortable with our government, or self-selecting individuals, or groups such as WikiLeaks and Anonymous, or established newspapers having the final say over the release of government secrets?  

And what about protection of our personal privacy?  Are there related issues around ‘consumer/customer surveillance’ private data collection?



The information and sources provided as well as the views expressed here reflect
neither the views of DAUK  or the Democratic Party nor their endorsement of, or association with them.

Written by:
elaine
Published on:
June 23, 2020

Categories: Film Committee & Film Nights, Past DAUK Film Nights

Explore more

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
Donate to Democrats Abroad

Footer

Join Democrats Abroad | Press Enquiries | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2021 Democrats Abroad UK

We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
Cookie settingsRead MoreACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

Non-necessary

Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.

SAVE & ACCEPT